Sometimes our Tennis Server Player of the Year is the year's male or female
champion. But often we choose a different player--one whose achievements during
the year seem, while perhaps narrower, of surpassing substance and historic
dimension.
THE WOMEN PROS IN 2005
Once again, injuries seriously depleted the cast of top women during most of
the year. The phenomenon especially plagued the year's Slam-winners. Serena
Williams, who won Australian Open brilliantly, Justine Henin-Hardenne, who won
Garros, and Venus Williams, Wimbledon champion, all spent large parts of the
year on the sidelines. Kim Clijsters, who missed much of 2004 with bad left
wrist, returned to excellent success in spring 2005 and then captured U.S. Open.
Kim finally faded at the year-end event in Los Angeles, where she had been
favored.
The year's points champion--the year-end #1--was Lindsay Davenport, but she
too faltered at Los Angeles, where Mauresmo defeated Pierce in the final match.
Elena Dementieva became an interesting candidate by leading Russia to its 3-2
victory over France in the Fed Cup final. Elena defeated both Mauresmo and
Pierce in singles, and joined Safina to win the doubles. (Elena lost to Venus in
July but was otherwise undefeated in Russia's three Cup engagements during
the year.)
In our quest for 2005 Player of the Year, none of the females seem ahead of
the three males next to be discussed. For the record we give a slight edge to
Clijsters over the other women for her successful comeback, with Dementieva
narrowly next.
But it seems clear that there are three nominees from the men's side all of
whom bring superior credentials for 2005.
ROGER FEDERER
Two years ago we honored Roger Federer for his spendid performance at age 21
in winning Wimbledon 2003, his first Slam triumph. On that historic grass
Roger displayed a range of perfection rarely seen in recent decades, combining
all-court shotmaking and mobility with a level of net play especially unusual
nowadays. Then last year, 2004, Federer again became our Player of the Year,
having swept through to win three of the four Slams plus the year-ending Masters
Cup, showing all the brilliance and variety promised in the previous year.
This year, 2005, has been only slightly less lustrous for Roger, who captured
both Wimbledon and U.S. Open and finished far ahead in the year's points
race. That he is current men's singles champion is simply beyond argument. During
the year Roger's W-L record was 81-4, where he captured 11 tournaments
including two Slams and four Masters Series tournaments. Until losing in the final at
Shanghai, he had been undefeated in 24 consecutive tournament finals. Rarely
is a year's male champion more dominant.
Even his few losses attested to Roger's greatness. In matches that now seem
among the year's finest, Roger lost to Marat Safin in a five-set semi at
Australian Open, to rising star Rafael Nadal in a four-set semi at Garros, and to
David Nalbandian in five sets in Shanghai, where Roger required support for an
injured ankle that had sidelined him for more than a month.
A significant added credit in my mind was Roger's occasional doubles activity
in 2005 as partner for fellow Swiss player Yves Allegro, 17. The payoff came
in late September, when the pair Allegro-Federer produced a victory in Davis
Cup doubles against Britain, defeating Andy Murray and Rusedski and thereby
establishing Switzerland's World Group status for 2006.
IVAN LJUBICIC
European star Ivan Ljubicic, 26, penetrated the year-end top ten in singles
for the first time. But by far his surpassing achievement was his remarkable
Davis Cup record in leading Croatia to its first Cup championship.
Ivan's Davis Cup run began on a California hard court in early March with
singles victories over U.S. top-tenners Roddick and Agassi and a doubles victory
(with team-matc Ancic) over the Bryan twins. Ivan's three wins spelled a
stunning team victory for Croatia over the favored hosts by margin 3-1 in
meaningful matches, where the clinching win over Roddick required five sets. The
winners talked cautiously of a possible Cup triumph in 2005.
The circumstances of the win over the Americans were almost identically
repeated in Croatia's next victories, over visitors Romania in July and Russia in
September, respectively. In all three cases, a Ljubicic win produced a 1-1 team
tally after the first day, an Ancic-Ljubicic doubles win gave Croatia a 2-1
lead the second day, and a Ljubicic win in the opening match of the final day
clinched a Croatian win by 3-1. Ivan's run of success in almost single-handedly
producing all three team triumphs attracted worldwide notice.
Things at first unfolded identically in the final show-down at Bratislava,
Slovak Republic, in December, when a Ljubicic singles win again produced a 1-1
first-day split and when a Ancic-Ljubicic win placed Croatia ahead 2-1 on day
two. Again, Ivan was scheduled to play the fourth match. His opponent was
pleasant, hard-hitting Dominik Hrbaty, whom Ivan had beaten in all five of their
adult pro meetings. But nothing is certain in sports, certainly not in Davis Cup
tennis.
It would have been the year's singular achievement--capture of all four Cup
meetings in a championship year practically single-handedly by one player, a
12-0 individual record in Cup play, all in meaningful matches. But instead,
Ivan's five-set loss to Hrbaty in Bratislava created a 2-2 team tally and left the
critical contribution for Mario Ancic. Mario then defeated Slovak player
Mertinak in straight sets to complete the Croatian victory, with team-member Goran
Ivanisevic serving on the sidelines.
RAFAEL NADAL
Rafael Nadal burst on the international tennis scene at age 18 last year,
2004, when he broke into the world's top fifty despite a difficult ankle injury,
ending the year by spearheading Spain's Davis Cup triumph with a fine win over
Roddick. Rafael's explosive arrival continued in 2005, when he established
himself the world's clay-court champion, winning early-year events in Latin
America, then winning the big spring tournaments at Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Rome,
and Garros, and continuing his success into the summer on European clay.
Rafael also scored well on hard courts. He forced Hewitt to five sets at Australian
Open, took Federer to five in the final at Miami, won Canadian Open in
August, defeating Agassi, and won Madrid indoors in October, defeating Ljubicic.
Foot troubles prevented his playing at Shanghai for an anticipated meeting with
Federer. He finished second in the year's points race to Roger, well ahead of
Hewitt and Roddick.
What especially distinguishes Nadal is the ferocity of his game--heavy
artillery both from the left-handed forehand and two-handed backhand, backed by
extreme court speed and a supercharged court temperament that probably disturbs an
opponent's concentration. He seems to delight in his muscular physique and in
demonstrating his freshness by vigorous activity during changeovers. The extra
energy spent in these displays may have cost him the fifth set in Miami,
however, where Federer was clearly the fresher at the end, probably because of
Roger's better energy conservation throughout the match. But for most watchers,
Rafael's wonderful play, his unusual garb, his animalistic confidence, and his
boistrous energy proved fascinating--a marked contrast, whether or not welcome,
to the composure of the champion.
Nadal's triumph at Garros came in his first appearance at that event. His
overall W-L record for 2005 was 79-10. Subsequent to his only loss on clay all
year, in April, his all-surface record was 55-4. He entered the doubles in many
tournaments, usually with a partner from his own country, recording a 19-11
doubles record. He was loyal to Davis Cup participation, winning two singles in
helping Spain remain in World Group by defeating Italy in September.
But if Rafael at age 19 is a wild one even for modern tennis, the brute force
of his power-hitting from back court along with his proven ability to defeat
high-quality opponents is indeed impressive--perhaps unmatched by anyone at his
young age in recent decades. For 2005, his was a fresh intrusion, a roaring
statement that captivated the tennis world.
PLAYER OF THE YEAR
Rafael Nadal - Tennis Server 2005 Player of Year (photo courtesy ATP) |
Who should become our Player of the Year--(1) the year's male champion, (2)
the prime hero of Davis Cup 2005, or (3) the younger, rising star who commanded
the clay and whose impact on tennis fandom was huge?
Especially for making the salient single achievement of the year in pro
tennis--the winning of Garros in his first try--but also for the uniqueness and
force of his impact on those who watch and enjoy international tennis, our Player
of the Year for 2005 is Rafael Nadal. There should be many great years ahead
for this sizzler. Perhaps he will be the one, beyond Agassi, to break the
barrier that nowadays commonly divides the hard-court and the clay-court champions.
TENNIS NATION OF THE YEAR
Of the several team competitions among the nations, foremost is Davis Cup,
won in 2005 by Croatia. Slovak Republic was second, and Russia and Argentina
tied for third. Meanwhile Russia's women won Fed Cup 2005, defeating France in
the final round by score 3-2. The fifth match was the decider, the doubles,
where Demetieva-Safina defeated Pierce-Mauresmo in split sets. In World Team
Cup--the men's event held annually on clay just before Garros--Germany closely
defeated Argentina in the final round, where the key match was Tommy Haas's
victory over Gaston Gaudio. In Hopman Cup--the men's-women's mixed team event in
Australia in January--the winner was Slovak Republic when both Hantuchova and
Hrbaty defeated Argentine singles opponents in the final round. Argentina
reached the final by defeating all three opponents in the round-robin phase, in each
case obtaining the winning margin by winning the mixed doubles.
It was also interesting to tally singles and doubles wins by nation at each
major tournament. On the women's side, the Russian contingent won the most
matches at all four Slams and also at most of the Tier One events. The only
exceptions were Czech success at Charleston, a three-way tie among U.S., Italy, and
Russia at Zurich, and a French triumph at the WTA year-end event in Los
Angeles. After winning three individual singles Slams in 2004, the Russian women won
none in 2005. But by dominating in the match-win counts at the big
tournaments as well as in winning Fed Cup, the Russkayas made clear that they were again
the leading nation on the women's side for 2005.
Sorting out matters among the men is harder. The U.S. males led in the
match-win counts at three of the Slams, while Spain narrowly outdueled Argentina for
top place at Garros. Of the nine Masters Series tournaments, Spain led in
five, U.S. four, and Argentina one, while Argentina with Nalbandian and Gaudio
claimed the most wins at Masters Cup in Shanghai. The Russian males showed good
success in other respects, including a close loss to eventual champion Croatia
in their Davis Cup semi-final. (Two of Croatia's three wins came in five
sets.) A fine achievement was Russian Marat Safin's triumph at Australian Open 05,
though Marat had a frustrating year thereafter and was unable to help in the
late-year Cup effort. Marat dropped from #4 to #12 in the year-end rankings.
But several young Russian players moved up in the rankings during the
year--Davydenko, age 24, climbed from #28 to #5 at year's end, Andreev, age 22, from
#49 to #27, and Tursunov, 23, from #86 to #59. Youzhny, 23, meanwhile slipped
from #16 to #43.
Thus for the second straight year, we make Russia our choice as Tennis Nation
of the Year.
One oddity intruded while preparing this column. Several years ago it was
noticeable that very few top women's doubles pairs consisted of two players from
the same nation. The trend still seems strong. In the 2005 year-end rankings,
only four of the female top sixteen doubles teams but ten of the male top
sixteen are same-nation pairs. Should we look to biological, social,
circumstantial, or statistical explanations for the difference?
Best wishes to all for year-end celebrations worldwide and for the new year
ahead. Remember--it's not too early to start thinking about Australian Open 06.